TUG vs. BAMY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) and BAMY (Brookstone Yield ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TUG returned 40.10% vs 10.68% for BAMY. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUG charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.48%/yr for BAMY.

Performance

TUG vs. BAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a 20.36% return, which is significantly higher than BAMY's 1.16% return.

TUG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 11.01%
• YTD: 20.36%
• 6M: 19.04%
• 1Y: 40.10%
• 3Y*: 23.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMY

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 1.80%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUG vs. BAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	20.36%	20.43%	19.37%	11.08%
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	1.16%	12.93%	10.60%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and BAMY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.77

The correlation between TUG and BAMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

TUG vs. BAMY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TUG	BAMY
Technology	54.6%	40.4%
Communication Services	15.4%	13.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	12.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	5.3%
Healthcare	4.1%	8.7%
Industrials	3.0%	6.6%
Utilities	1.4%	2.5%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.5%
Energy	0.7%	1.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	6.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.3%

Return for Risk

TUG vs. BAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG

TUG Risk / Return Rank: 70
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

BAMY

BAMY Risk / Return Rank: 79
BAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. BAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUG	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.33	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.39	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.49	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	4.32	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.47	19.33	-6.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TUG vs. BAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the BAMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUG and BAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUG	BAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.33	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	1.87	-0.75

Drawdowns

TUG vs. BAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than BAMY's maximum drawdown of -6.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and BAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUG	BAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.27%	-6.03%	-16.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-2.48%	-9.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.24%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.31%	-0.53%	-3.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	0.55%	+2.67%

Volatility

TUG vs. BAMY - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Brookstone Yield ETF (BAMY) at 1.09%. This indicates that TUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUG	BAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	1.09%	+3.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	2.80%	+9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.16%	4.62%	+11.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.02%	6.03%	+11.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.02%	6.03%	+11.99%

TUG vs. BAMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMY's 1.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUG vs. BAMY - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than BAMY's 7.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAMY Brookstone Yield ETF	7.59%	7.16%	8.20%	1.96%	0.00%
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	1.43%	1.75%	4.97%	1.34%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUG and BAMY in my portfolio?

TUG and BAMY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUG or BAMY?

TUG has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to BAMY (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUG dropped -22.27% vs BAMY's -6.03%.

Which ETF is better, TUG or BAMY?

On 1-year performance, TUG leads with 40.10% vs 10.68% for BAMY. On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BAMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUG or BAMY?

Over the 1-year period, TUG has performed better with a 40.10% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUG or BAMY?

TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.48% for BAMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUG or BAMY?

BAMY has the higher dividend yield at 7.59%, compared with 1.43% for TUG.

What is the main difference between TUG and BAMY?

They also come from different issuers: STF and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUG and 1.48% for BAMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.