TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO
TUEX.TO (TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF) and ZEQL.TO (BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units)) are both exchange-traded funds - TUEX.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by TD Asset Management, while ZEQL.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. TUEX.TO is actively managed, while ZEQL.TO is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUEX.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for ZEQL.TO.
Performance
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TUEX.TO
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 25.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZEQL.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TUEX.TO TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF | 6.98% |
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUEX.TO and ZEQL.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TUEX.TO
ZEQL.TO
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF (TUEX.TO) and BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUEX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUEX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 2.01 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUEX.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, which is greater than ZEQL.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUEX.TO and ZEQL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUEX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -6.12% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -0.58% | -1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -1.69% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUEX.TO | ZEQL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 12.92% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 12.92% | +6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 12.92% | +6.98% |
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUEX.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQL.TO's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUEX.TO vs. ZEQL.TO - Dividend Comparison
TUEX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ZEQL.TO's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TUEX.TO TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF | 2.60% | 2.79% | 2.36% | 11.90% |
ZEQL.TO BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUEX.TO and ZEQL.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEQL.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for TUEX.TO.
TUEX.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZEQL.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: TD Asset Management and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for TUEX.TO and 0.05% for ZEQL.TO.
Find the right allocation for TUEX.TO and ZEQL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer