PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period


ZEQL.TO

1D
0.73%
1M
3.04%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTOT.TO

1D
1.02%
1M
5.63%
YTD
2.67%
6M
3.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZEQL.TO and XTOT.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI USA Equal Weight Index ETF (CAD Units) (ZEQL.TO) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market Index ETF (XTOT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZEQL.TOXTOT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

1.69

-1.77

Drawdowns

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum XTOT.TO drawdown of -9.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEQL.TO and XTOT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZEQL.TOXTOT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-9.64%

+3.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-1.59%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-2.04%

-0.53%

Volatility

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZEQL.TOXTOT.TODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.46%

13.17%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.46%

13.17%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.46%

13.17%

+0.29%

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZEQL.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XTOT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZEQL.TO vs. XTOT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZEQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than XTOT.TO's 0.67% yield.