TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
TUEX.TO (TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds. TUEX.TO is actively managed, while ZDIV.TO is passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUEX.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TUEX.TO
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 12.01%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 25.69%
- 3Y*
- 23.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TUEX.TO TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF | 12.55% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUEX.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TUEX.TO
ZDIV.TO
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF (TUEX.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUEX.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUEX.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 5.66 | -4.44 |
Drawdowns
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUEX.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUEX.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUEX.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -2.60% | -19.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.02% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -0.49% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | — | — |
Volatility
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUEX.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.43% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.82% | 9.99% | +6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 9.99% | +9.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 9.99% | +9.91% |
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUEX.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUEX.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
TUEX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TUEX.TO TD Active U.S. Enhanced Dividend CAD Hedged ETF | 2.60% | 2.79% | 2.36% | 11.90% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUEX.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for TUEX.TO.
They also come from different issuers: TD Asset Management and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for TUEX.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for TUEX.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer