TUA vs. YCS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - TUA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). TUA is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned -0.18%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.

Performance

TUA vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 9.63% return.

TUA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: -6.11%
• 6M: -5.54%
• 1Y: -3.80%
• 3Y*: -0.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

YCS

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.57%
• YTD: 9.63%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 31.27%
• 3Y*: 18.37%
• 5Y*: 23.52%
• 10Y*: 13.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUA vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	-6.11%	7.27%	-3.59%	-2.04%	-0.83%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	9.63%	9.04%	35.41%	28.70%	-11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TUA and YCS is -0.51, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022	-0.53

The correlation between TUA and YCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TUA vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUA

TUA Risk / Return Rank: 4
TUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TUA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Martin Ratio Rank: 2

YCS

YCS Risk / Return Rank: 63
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUA vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TUA	YCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.86	-2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	2.36	-3.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.34	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	3.78	-4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	11.93	-13.23

TUA vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUA Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUA and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TUA vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and YCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUA	YCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-49.56%	+33.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-8.30%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.14%	-23.05%	+13.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.32%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.75%	-0.14%	-10.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-19.87%	+11.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	2.65%	+0.28%

Volatility

TUA vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUA	YCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	2.25%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.28%	12.19%	-6.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.03%	16.93%	-9.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.75%	21.10%	-10.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.75%	18.82%	-8.07%

TUA vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUA vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	3.58%	3.84%	5.19%	4.83%	0.15%
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUA and YCS in my portfolio?

TUA and YCS have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUA or YCS?

TUA has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs YCS's -49.56%.

Which ETF is better, TUA or YCS?

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 18.37% vs -0.18% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUA or YCS?

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 18.37% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUA or YCS?

TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUA or YCS?

TUA has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

What is the main difference between TUA and YCS?

TUA is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 1.00% for YCS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.