TUA vs. HTAB

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned 0.25%/yr vs 2.98%/yr for HTAB. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.

Performance

TUA vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 1.50% return.

TUA

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: -4.64%
• YTD: -5.65%
• 1Y: -2.52%
• 3Y*: 0.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HTAB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 1.21%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 1Y: 7.38%
• 3Y*: 2.98%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUA vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	-5.65%	7.27%	-3.59%	-2.04%	-0.83%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	1.50%	2.86%	1.52%	7.16%	3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TUA and HTAB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022	0.57

The correlation between TUA and HTAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TUA vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUA

TUA Risk / Return Rank: 6
TUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TUA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
TUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TUA Martin Ratio Rank: 6

HTAB

HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 73
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUA vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TUA	HTAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.36	1.89	-2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.46	2.85	-3.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.37	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	2.60	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	8.44	-9.19

TUA vs. HTAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUA Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the HTAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUA and HTAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TUA vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than HTAB's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and HTAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUA	HTAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-14.76%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-2.85%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.14%	-8.42%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.31%	-0.85%	-9.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.42%	-2.86%	-5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	0.88%	+2.46%

Volatility

TUA vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 0.73%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUA	HTAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	0.73%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.51%	2.80%	+2.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.02%	3.93%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.69%	5.74%	+4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.69%	5.14%	+5.55%

TUA vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUA vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison

TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than HTAB's 3.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	3.87%	3.88%	3.57%	3.21%	2.26%	2.18%	1.64%	2.77%	1.61%
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	3.33%	3.84%	5.19%	4.83%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUA and HTAB in my portfolio?

TUA and HTAB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUA or HTAB?

TUA has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to HTAB (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs HTAB's -14.76%.

Which ETF is better, TUA or HTAB?

On 3-year performance, HTAB leads with 2.98% vs 0.25% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, HTAB has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUA or HTAB?

Over the 3-year period, HTAB has performed better with a 2.98% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUA or HTAB?

TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUA or HTAB?

HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.33% for TUA.

What is the main difference between TUA and HTAB?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.39% for HTAB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HTAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.