TUA vs. HTAB
TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned -0.77%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for HTAB. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.
Performance
TUA vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -4.96% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 1.59% return.
TUA
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- -4.51%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- -0.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAB
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
TUA vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | -4.96% | 7.27% | -3.59% | -2.04% | -0.81% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 1.59% | 2.86% | 1.52% | 7.16% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUA and HTAB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TUA and HTAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUA vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank
TUA
HTAB
TUA vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUA | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.32 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 2.37 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 7.48 | -8.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUA | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 1.68 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.44 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
TUA vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than HTAB's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and HTAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUA | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -14.76% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.68% | -2.85% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.14% | -8.42% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.65% | -0.76% | -8.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -2.89% | -5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 0.90% | +1.66% |
Volatility
TUA vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 1.24%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUA | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.00% | 1.24% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.85% | 2.80% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.86% | 4.02% | +2.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 5.74% | +5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 5.17% | +5.59% |
TUA vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUA vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison
TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than HTAB's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.83% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% |
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF | 3.54% | 3.84% | 5.19% | 4.83% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUA and HTAB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUA has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to HTAB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs HTAB's -14.76%.
On 3-year performance, HTAB leads with 3.35% vs -0.77% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, HTAB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HTAB has performed better with a 3.35% return vs -0.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 3.54% for TUA.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUA and HTAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer