TUA vs. BFIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TUA (Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF) and BFIX (Build Bond Innovation ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUA returned -0.18%/yr vs 7.39%/yr for BFIX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BFIX.

Performance

TUA vs. BFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUA achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly lower than BFIX's 0.67% return.

TUA

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: -6.11%
• 6M: -5.54%
• 1Y: -3.80%
• 3Y*: -0.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFIX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.45%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUA vs. BFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	-6.11%	7.27%	-3.59%	-2.04%	-0.83%
BFIX Build Bond Innovation ETF	0.67%	5.91%	12.95%	4.97%	0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TUA and BFIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2022	0.41

Return for Risk

TUA vs. BFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUA

TUA Risk / Return Rank: 4
TUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TUA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TUA Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BFIX

BFIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
BFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
BFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
BFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
BFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUA vs. BFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TUA	BFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	1.30	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	1.98	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.25	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	3.76	-4.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.30	8.83	-10.13

TUA vs. BFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUA Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the BFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUA and BFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TUA vs. BFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUA drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, which is greater than BFIX's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUA and BFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUA	BFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-8.54%	-7.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.37%	-0.99%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.14%	-4.05%	-5.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.75%	-0.99%	-9.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.39%	-2.99%	-5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	0.42%	+2.51%

Volatility

TUA vs. BFIX - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TUA) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) at 0.63%. This indicates that TUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUA	BFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.72%	0.63%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.28%	1.72%	+3.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.03%	2.86%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.75%	4.76%	+5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.75%	4.76%	+5.99%

TUA vs. BFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than BFIX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUA vs. BFIX - Dividend Comparison

TUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, which matches BFIX's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BFIX Build Bond Innovation ETF	3.55%	3.73%	4.38%	4.30%	1.58%
TUA Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF	3.58%	3.84%	5.19%	4.83%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUA and BFIX in my portfolio?

TUA and BFIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUA or BFIX?

TUA has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to BFIX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUA dropped -15.85% vs BFIX's -8.54%.

Which ETF is better, TUA or BFIX?

On 3-year performance, BFIX leads with 7.39% vs -0.18% for TUA. On fees, TUA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, BFIX has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUA or BFIX?

Over the 3-year period, BFIX has performed better with a 7.39% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUA or BFIX?

TUA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BFIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUA or BFIX?

TUA has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.55% for BFIX.

What is the main difference between TUA and BFIX?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Build. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for TUA and 0.45% for BFIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.