PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFIX vs. USDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFIX vs. USDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFIX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than USDX's 2.50% return.


BFIX

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.46%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
10Y*

USDX

1D
0.31%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.50%
6M
2.69%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFIX vs. USDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
0.79%5.91%12.12%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
2.50%6.25%6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between BFIX and USDX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFIX vs. USDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFIX
BFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
BFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

USDX
USDX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
USDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
USDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFIX vs. USDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) and SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFIXUSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.77

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

6.93

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.60

44.32

-34.72

BFIX vs. USDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the USDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFIX and USDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFIX vs. USDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than USDX's maximum drawdown of -0.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFIX and USDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFIXUSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-0.94%

-7.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.94%

-0.94%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-0.06%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.15%

+0.27%

Volatility

BFIX vs. USDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) is 0.62%, while SGI Enhanced Core ETF (USDX) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that BFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFIXUSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

1.12%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

1.90%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

2.07%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.76%

1.74%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.76%

1.74%

+3.02%

BFIX vs. USDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than USDX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFIX vs. USDX - Dividend Comparison

BFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than USDX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
3.54%3.73%4.38%4.30%1.58%
USDX
SGI Enhanced Core ETF
5.86%5.88%4.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFIX and USDX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USDX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to BFIX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFIX dropped -8.54% vs USDX's -0.94%.

On 1-year performance, USDX leads with 6.47% vs 3.99% for BFIX. On fees, BFIX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BFIX has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USDX has performed better with a 6.47% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BFIX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for USDX.

USDX has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 3.54% for BFIX.

They also come from different issuers: Build and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BFIX and 0.98% for USDX.

USDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFIX and USDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer