PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TTT vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TTT vs. VCIT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while VCIT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TTT returned -1.30%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for VCIT. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. TTT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCIT.

Performance

TTT vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TTT has underperformed VCIT with an annualized return of -1.30%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.95% annualized return.

TTT

1D
-0.75%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
2.52%
6M
8.18%
1Y
-7.12%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
-1.30%

VCIT

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.50%
1Y
6.39%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
1.35%
10Y*
2.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTT vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury		2.52%-7.89%38.07%-11.25%150.17%2.55%-54.12%-34.88%6.34%-25.87%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF		0.40%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TTT and VCIT is -0.84, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

-0.76

The correlation between TTT and VCIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.87 (3 years) to -0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF

Often compared with TTT:
TTT vs. TMFTTT vs. TBTTTT vs. TLTTTT vs. TMVTTT vs. TBFTTT vs. PFIXTTT vs. SPY
Often compared with VCIT:
VCIT vs. BNDVCIT vs. LQDVCIT vs. IGIBVCIT vs. VTCVCIT vs. VCLTVCIT vs. SPIBVCIT vs. VTEB

Return for Risk

TTT vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TTT
TTT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTT vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TTTVCITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

1.57

-1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.15

2.32

-2.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.28

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

2.10

-2.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.40

7.05

-7.44

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTT vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTT Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTT and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TTTVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

1.57

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.21

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

0.47

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.76

-0.99

Drawdowns

TTT vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and VCIT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TTTVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.00%

-20.56%

-73.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.51%

-2.96%

-19.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.69%

-6.11%

-43.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.69%

-20.56%

-29.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.76%

-20.56%

-61.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.50%

-1.14%

-77.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.36%

-3.16%

-67.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.12%

0.88%

+11.24%

Volatility

TTT vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.39%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TTTVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.87%

1.39%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

3.07%

+16.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.35%

4.10%

+25.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.18%

6.61%

+40.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.39%

6.28%

+37.11%

TTT vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTT vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than VCIT's 4.79% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury		9.43%9.87%4.86%12.15%0.34%0.00%0.29%1.88%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF		4.79%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

TTT and VCIT have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTT has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to VCIT (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 10-year performance, VCIT leads with 2.95% vs -1.30% for TTT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 2.95% return vs -1.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.43%, compared with 4.79% for VCIT.

TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TTT and 0.04% for VCIT.

VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTT and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer