TTT vs. PFFL
TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) and PFFL (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - TTT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while PFFL is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTT returned 18.57%/yr vs -6.57%/yr for PFFL. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. TTT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PFFL.
Performance
TTT vs. PFFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than PFFL's -1.90% return.
TTT
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- -4.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 18.57%
- 10Y*
- -0.85%
PFFL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -1.90%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- -6.57%
- 10Y*
- —
TTT vs. PFFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 0.59% | -7.89% | 38.07% | -11.25% | 150.17% | 2.55% | -54.12% | -34.88% | -12.85% |
PFFL ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN | -1.90% | 2.18% | 4.77% | 8.65% | -39.15% | 7.52% | -15.47% | 30.21% | -10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTT and PFFL is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2018 | -0.23 |
The correlation between TTT and PFFL shifts across timeframes, from -0.40 (3 years) to -0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTT vs. PFFL — Risk / Return Rank
TTT
PFFL
TTT vs. PFFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTT | PFFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.07 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 0.41 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 0.94 | -1.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTT vs. PFFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than PFFL's maximum drawdown of -80.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and PFFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTT | PFFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.00% | -80.68% | -13.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -11.92% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.69% | -23.75% | -25.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.69% | -48.51% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.91% | -39.57% | -39.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.37% | -28.59% | -41.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.89% | 5.14% | +6.75% |
Volatility
TTT vs. PFFL - Volatility Comparison
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL) at 4.10%. This indicates that TTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTT | PFFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.36% | 4.10% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.77% | 10.67% | +9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.33% | 17.12% | +11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.02% | 23.66% | +23.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.32% | 55.16% | -11.84% |
TTT vs. PFFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTT vs. PFFL - Dividend Comparison
TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, less than PFFL's 13.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFL ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN | 13.14% | 13.27% | 13.76% | 13.71% | 13.90% | 8.82% | 9.75% | 11.21% | 2.02% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 9.61% | 9.87% | 4.86% | 12.15% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 1.88% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTT and PFFL have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTT has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to PFFL (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTT dropped -94.00% vs PFFL's -80.68%.
On 5-year performance, TTT leads with 18.57% vs -6.57% for PFFL. On fees, PFFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, PFFL has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTT has performed better with a 18.57% return vs -6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TTT.
PFFL has the higher dividend yield at 13.14%, compared with 9.61% for TTT.
TTT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while PFFL is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%), while PFFL tracks Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TTT and 0.85% for PFFL.
PFFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTT and PFFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer