TTI vs. KEP
TTI (TETRA Technologies, Inc.) and KEP (Korea Electric Power Corporation) are both stocks. TTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while KEP operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, TTI returned 5.28%/yr vs -5.73%/yr for KEP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTI vs. KEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTI achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than KEP's -22.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TTI has outperformed KEP with an annualized return of 5.28%, while KEP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.73% annualized return.
TTI
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 189.69%
- 3Y*
- 52.72%
- 5Y*
- 22.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
KEP
- 1D
- 4.33%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -22.67%
- 6M
- -21.03%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- -5.73%
TTI vs. KEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTI TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 10.99% | 161.73% | -20.80% | 30.64% | 21.83% | 229.66% | -56.05% | 16.67% | -60.66% | -12.29% |
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation | -22.67% | 147.56% | -4.05% | -16.09% | -5.47% | -25.51% | 3.72% | -19.80% | -16.71% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTI and KEP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
TTI:
$1.43B
KEP:
$16.55B
TTI:
$0.05
KEP:
₩6.83K
TTI:
192.79
KEP:
2.84
TTI:
0.23
KEP:
0.06
TTI:
2.23
KEP:
0.26
TTI:
4.98
KEP:
0.51
TTI:
$630.05M
KEP:
₩97.47T
TTI:
$154.82M
KEP:
₩16.07T
TTI:
$85.97M
KEP:
₩29.23T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTI vs. KEP — Risk / Return Rank
TTI
KEP
TTI vs. KEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTI | KEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.12 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 0.48 | +4.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | 1.10 | +11.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTI vs. KEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTI drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than KEP's maximum drawdown of -78.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTI and KEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTI | KEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.27% | -78.55% | -20.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.66% | -48.84% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.43% | -48.84% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.43% | -51.34% | -16.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.60% | -78.55% | -18.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.65% | -50.75% | -14.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.74% | -44.51% | -11.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.07% | 20.99% | -5.92% |
Volatility
TTI vs. KEP - Volatility Comparison
TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEP) at 11.47%. This indicates that TTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTI | KEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 11.47% | +6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.03% | 37.85% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.80% | 53.54% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.37% | 38.10% | +23.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.51% | 35.40% | +40.11% |
Dividends
TTI vs. KEP - Dividend Comparison
TTI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEP Korea Electric Power Corporation | 4.09% | 3.16% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.68% | 6.46% |
TTI TETRA Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TTI vs. KEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Korea Electric Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTI vs. KEP - Profitability Comparison
TTI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.23M and revenue of 156.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.
KEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.68T and revenue of 25.13T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.6%.
TTI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.82M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
KEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported an operating income of 3.93T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
TTI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 8.32M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
KEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Korea Electric Power Corporation reported a net income of 2.59T and revenue of 25.13T, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTI and KEP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTI has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to KEP (11.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTI dropped -99.27% vs KEP's -78.55%.
TTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTI and KEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer