PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTI vs. HLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTI vs. HLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTI achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than HLF's -6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, TTI has outperformed HLF with an annualized return of 5.28%, while HLF has yielded a comparatively lower -8.54% annualized return.


TTI

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
10.99%
6M
18.18%
1Y
189.69%
3Y*
52.72%
5Y*
22.11%
10Y*
5.28%

HLF

1D
-0.90%
1M
-7.00%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
-1.03%
5Y*
-25.81%
10Y*
-8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTI vs. HLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
10.99%161.73%-20.80%30.64%21.83%229.66%-56.05%16.67%-60.66%-12.29%
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.
-6.21%92.68%-56.16%2.55%-63.65%-14.82%0.80%-19.13%74.10%40.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TTI and HLF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2004

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTI:

$1.43B

HLF:

$1.31B

EPS

TTI:

$0.05

HLF:

$2.29

PE Ratio

TTI:

192.79

HLF:

5.28

PS Ratio

TTI:

2.23

HLF:

0.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTI:

$630.05M

HLF:

$5.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTI:

$154.82M

HLF:

$3.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTI:

$85.97M

HLF:

$423.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTI vs. HLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTI
TTI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HLF
HLF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTI vs. HLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTIHLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.18

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

1.07

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

2.50

+10.15

TTI vs. HLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTI Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the HLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTI and HLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTI vs. HLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTI drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than HLF's maximum drawdown of -91.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTI and HLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTIHLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-91.69%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.66%

-43.39%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.43%

-72.73%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.43%

-90.58%

+23.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.60%

-91.69%

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.65%

-80.33%

+14.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-31.70%

-24.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.07%

18.62%

-3.55%

Volatility

TTI vs. HLF - Volatility Comparison

TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) at 12.61%. This indicates that TTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTIHLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

12.61%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.03%

39.52%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.80%

61.20%

-3.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.37%

60.85%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.51%

49.94%

+25.57%

Dividends

TTI vs. HLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTI nor HLF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.34%

Financials

TTI vs. HLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
156.25M
1.32B
(TTI) Total Revenue
(HLF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTI vs. HLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
24.5%
77.9%
Portfolio components
TTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.23M and revenue of 156.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

HLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.

TTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.82M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

HLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported an operating income of -5.50M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

TTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 8.32M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

HLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a net income of 61.90M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTI and HLF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTI has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to HLF (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTI dropped -99.27% vs HLF's -91.69%.

TTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTI and HLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer