PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLF vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLF vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLF achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, HLF has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -8.17%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.05% annualized return.


HLF

1D
1.07%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
-10.71%
1Y
50.06%
3Y*
-0.99%
5Y*
-25.00%
10Y*
-8.17%

AAPL

1D
-0.91%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
8.46%
6M
8.26%
1Y
46.63%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
30.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLF vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.
-4.89%92.68%-56.16%2.55%-63.65%-14.82%0.80%-19.13%74.10%40.67%
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.46%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HLF and AAPL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2004

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLF:

$1.33B

AAPL:

$4.35T

EPS

HLF:

$2.29

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

HLF:

5.36

AAPL:

35.73

PS Ratio

HLF:

0.25

AAPL:

9.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLF:

$5.13B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLF:

$3.93B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

HLF:

$423.60M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLF vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLF
HLF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLF vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HLFAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.40

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

8.35

-5.79

HLF vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLF and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HLF vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLF drawdown since its inception was -91.69%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLF and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLFAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.69%

-81.80%

-9.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.39%

-13.80%

-29.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.73%

-33.36%

-39.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.58%

-33.36%

-57.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.69%

-38.52%

-53.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.06%

-6.63%

-73.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-29.58%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.62%

5.60%

+14.02%

Volatility

HLF vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.98%. This indicates that HLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLFAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.10%

6.98%

+5.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.07%

16.62%

+22.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.92%

22.57%

+38.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.89%

27.52%

+33.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.88%

28.92%

+20.96%

Dividends

HLF vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

HLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HLF vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
1.32B
111.18B
(HLF) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HLF vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
77.9%
49.3%
Portfolio components
HLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

HLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported an operating income of -5.50M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

HLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a net income of 61.90M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HLF and AAPL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLF has higher volatility (12.10%) compared to AAPL (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLF dropped -91.69% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLF and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer