HLF vs. EPAM

In the year-to-date period, HLF achieves a -48.20% return, which is significantly lower than EPAM's -20.87% return. Over the past 10 years, HLF has underperformed EPAM with an annualized return of -8.87%, while EPAM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.16% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the EPAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLF and EPAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither HLF nor EPAM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum HLF drawdown since its inception was -89.05%, which is greater than EPAM's maximum drawdown of -76.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLF and EPAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) and EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) have volatilities of 16.73% and 16.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. and EPAM Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.