PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTI vs. FIGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTI vs. FIGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTI achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly higher than FIGS's 5.28% return.


TTI

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
10.99%
6M
18.18%
1Y
189.69%
3Y*
52.72%
5Y*
22.11%
10Y*
5.28%

FIGS

1D
6.03%
1M
-2.05%
YTD
5.28%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
129.56%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
-18.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTI vs. FIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
10.99%161.73%-20.80%30.64%21.83%-20.89%
FIGS
FIGS, Inc.
5.28%83.52%-10.94%3.27%-75.58%-2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between TTI and FIGS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTI:

$1.43B

FIGS:

$2.35B

EPS

TTI:

$0.05

FIGS:

$0.22

PE Ratio

TTI:

192.79

FIGS:

54.44

PEG Ratio

TTI:

0.23

FIGS:

0.21

PS Ratio

TTI:

2.23

FIGS:

3.32

PB Ratio

TTI:

4.98

FIGS:

5.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTI:

$630.05M

FIGS:

$666.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTI:

$154.82M

FIGS:

$443.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

TTI:

$85.97M

FIGS:

$56.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTI vs. FIGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTI
TTI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
TTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTI Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGS
FIGS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTI vs. FIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTIFIGSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.38

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

3.82

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

10.67

+1.97

TTI vs. FIGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTI Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the FIGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTI and FIGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTI vs. FIGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTI drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than FIGS's maximum drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTI and FIGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTIFIGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.27%

-92.77%

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.66%

-34.11%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.43%

-57.56%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.43%

-92.77%

+25.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.65%

-76.13%

+10.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.74%

-75.87%

+20.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.07%

12.19%

+2.88%

Volatility

TTI vs. FIGS - Volatility Comparison

TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) at 13.33%. This indicates that TTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTIFIGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.32%

13.33%

+4.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.03%

51.28%

-10.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.80%

62.47%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.37%

70.12%

-8.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.51%

70.30%

+5.21%

Dividends

TTI vs. FIGS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTI nor FIGS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIGS
FIGS, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.34%

Financials

TTI vs. FIGS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and FIGS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
156.25M
159.90M
(TTI) Total Revenue
(FIGS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTI vs. FIGS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TETRA Technologies, Inc. and FIGS, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
24.5%
67.7%
Portfolio components
TTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.23M and revenue of 156.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

FIGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.

TTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.82M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

FIGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.48M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

TTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TETRA Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 8.32M and revenue of 156.25M, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

FIGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a net income of 6.29M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTI and FIGS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTI has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to FIGS (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTI dropped -99.27% vs FIGS's -92.77%.

TTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTI and FIGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer