TTEQ vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TTEQ (T. Rowe Price Technology ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTEQ charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

TTEQ vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TTEQ

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 18.60%
• YTD: 38.44%
• 6M: 35.90%
• 1Y: 66.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTEQ vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TTEQ T. Rowe Price Technology ETF	2.34%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TTEQ and ARMH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

TTEQ vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTEQ

TTEQ Risk / Return Rank: 78
TTEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TTEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TTEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TTEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TTEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTEQ vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTEQ	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTEQ	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	471,500.14	-471,498.53

Drawdowns

TTEQ vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTEQ drawdown since its inception was -26.97%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTEQ and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTEQ	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.97%	-1.61%	-25.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	0.00%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.76%	-0.40%	-4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TTEQ	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.30%	113.00%	-89.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.30%	113.00%	-85.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.30%	113.00%	-85.70%

TTEQ vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTEQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTEQ vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTEQ nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTEQ and ARMH in my portfolio?

TTEQ and ARMH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TTEQ or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TTEQ or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for TTEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TTEQ or ARMH?

TTEQ and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TTEQ and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for TTEQ and 0.19% for ARMH.