PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTDU vs. MVLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTDU vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -77.55% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.


TTDU

1D
-5.44%
1M
-31.38%
YTD
-77.55%
6M
-78.75%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MVLL

1D
7.14%
1M
201.84%
YTD
842.68%
6M
558.01%
1Y
1,215.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTDU vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TTDU
T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF
-77.55%-37.11%
MVLL
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
842.68%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TTDU and MVLL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTDU vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTDU

MVLL
MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTDU vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TTDU vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTDUMVLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.87

3.33

-4.20

Drawdowns

TTDU vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -89.89%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and MVLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDUMVLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.89%

-59.02%

-30.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.89%

0.00%

-89.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.22%

-22.42%

-36.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.46%

Volatility

TTDU vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDUMVLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

60.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

107.88%

133.11%

-25.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.88%

139.63%

-31.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.88%

139.63%

-31.75%

TTDU vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TTDU and MVLL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

TTDU vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTDU nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TTDU and MVLL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TTDU and MVLL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

TTDU and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTDU and MVLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer