TTDU vs. BDRY
TTDU (T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF) and BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while BDRY is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Dry Freight Futures Index. TTDU is actively managed, while BDRY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. TTDU charges 1.50%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for BDRY.
Performance
TTDU vs. BDRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTDU achieves a -83.24% return, which is significantly lower than BDRY's 34.21% return.
TTDU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- -38.58%
- YTD
- -83.24%
- 6M
- -82.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDRY
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- 34.21%
- 6M
- 34.67%
- 1Y
- 103.63%
- 3Y*
- 24.09%
- 5Y*
- -16.41%
- 10Y*
- —
TTDU vs. BDRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTDU T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF | -83.24% | -36.72% |
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 34.21% | 9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTDU and BDRY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTDU vs. BDRY — Risk / Return Rank
TTDU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDRY
TTDU vs. BDRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long TTD Daily Target ETF (TTDU) and Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTDU | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTDU vs. BDRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTDU drawdown since its inception was -92.45%, roughly equal to the maximum BDRY drawdown of -89.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDU and BDRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTDU | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.45% | -89.16% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -69.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.45% | -71.65% | -20.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.09% | -58.43% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.65% | — |
Volatility
TTDU vs. BDRY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTDU | BDRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.80% | 42.10% | +63.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.80% | 60.24% | +45.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.80% | 62.40% | +43.40% |
TTDU vs. BDRY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTDU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BDRY's 3.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTDU vs. BDRY - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTDU nor BDRY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTDU and BDRY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TTDU is cheaper at 1.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TTDU is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
TTDU and BDRY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TTDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BDRY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TTDU and 3.76% for BDRY.
Find the right allocation for TTDU and BDRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer