TTAN vs. FIG
Compare and contrast key facts about ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Figma, Inc (FIG).
Performance
TTAN vs. FIG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TTAN vs. FIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTAN ServiceTitan, Inc | -40.41% | -8.75% |
FIG Figma, Inc | -43.43% | -67.65% |
Fundamentals
TTAN:
$5.97B
FIG:
$10.80B
TTAN:
-$455.84
FIG:
-$2.64
TTAN:
0.02
FIG:
9.95
TTAN:
0.00
FIG:
7.15
TTAN:
$254.69B
FIG:
$1.06B
TTAN:
$178.14B
FIG:
$870.26M
TTAN:
-$42.72B
FIG:
-$1.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAN achieves a -40.41% return, which is significantly higher than FIG's -43.43% return.
TTAN
- 1D
- 4.63%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- -40.41%
- 6M
- -37.06%
- 1Y
- -33.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIG
- 1D
- 4.86%
- 1M
- -28.07%
- YTD
- -43.43%
- 6M
- -59.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAN vs. FIG — Risk / Return Rank
TTAN
FIG
TTAN vs. FIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Figma, Inc (FIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | -1.05 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAN and FIG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TTAN vs. FIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTAN nor FIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
TTAN vs. FIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAN drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, smaller than the maximum FIG drawdown of -83.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAN and FIG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.32% | -83.48% | +30.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.95% | -82.67% | +31.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -63.67% | +44.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.08% | — | — |
Volatility
TTAN vs. FIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.65% | 87.86% | -37.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.30% | 87.86% | -38.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.30% | 87.86% | -38.56% |
Financials
TTAN vs. FIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ServiceTitan, Inc and Figma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTAN vs. FIG - Profitability Comparison
TTAN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a gross profit of 177.65B and revenue of 253.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.0%.
FIG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 249.47M and revenue of 303.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.
TTAN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported an operating income of -42.67B and revenue of 253.99B, resulting in an operating margin of -16.8%.
FIG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -195.50M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -64.4%.
TTAN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a net income of -41.74B and revenue of 253.99B, resulting in a net margin of -16.4%.
FIG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -226.56M and revenue of 303.78M, resulting in a net margin of -74.6%.