TTAN vs. FIG
TTAN (ServiceTitan, Inc) and FIG (Figma, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TTAN vs. FIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAN achieves a -39.73% return, which is significantly higher than FIG's -49.18% return.
TTAN
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- -39.73%
- 6M
- -41.59%
- 1Y
- -38.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIG
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -16.38%
- YTD
- -49.18%
- 6M
- -50.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTAN vs. FIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTAN ServiceTitan, Inc | -39.73% | -8.83% |
FIG Figma, Inc | -49.18% | -56.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAN and FIG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.44 |
Fundamentals
TTAN:
$6.10B
FIG:
$9.94B
TTAN:
-$246.61
FIG:
-$2.91
TTAN:
0.02
FIG:
8.24
TTAN:
0.00
FIG:
6.82
TTAN:
$269.57B
FIG:
$1.16B
TTAN:
$194.32B
FIG:
$926.29M
TTAN:
-$25.80B
FIG:
-$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAN vs. FIG — Risk / Return Rank
TTAN
FIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TTAN vs. FIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Figma, Inc (FIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAN vs. FIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAN drawdown since its inception was -57.26%, smaller than the maximum FIG drawdown of -86.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAN and FIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.26% | -86.18% | +28.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.38% | -84.43% | +34.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.02% | -68.38% | +44.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.73% | — | — |
Volatility
TTAN vs. FIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAN | FIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.38% | 93.92% | -42.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.68% | 93.92% | -43.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.68% | 93.92% | -43.24% |
Dividends
TTAN vs. FIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTAN nor FIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TTAN vs. FIG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ServiceTitan, Inc and Figma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TTAN vs. FIG - Profitability Comparison
TTAN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a gross profit of 193.79B and revenue of 268.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
FIG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Figma, Inc reported a gross profit of 264.77M and revenue of 333.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.4%.
TTAN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported an operating income of -25.76B and revenue of 268.82B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.6%.
FIG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Figma, Inc reported an operating income of -137.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.2%.
TTAN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a net income of -22.82B and revenue of 268.82B, resulting in a net margin of -8.5%.
FIG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Figma, Inc reported a net income of -142.40M and revenue of 333.44M, resulting in a net margin of -42.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAN and FIG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TTAN and FIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer