TTAI vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TTAI is actively managed, while UMMA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TTAI returned 9.76%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TTAI charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

TTAI vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 32.32% return.

TTAI

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 3.82%
• 6M: 3.76%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 9.76%
• 5Y*: 1.76%
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 12.11%
• YTD: 32.32%
• 6M: 35.20%
• 1Y: 51.77%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAI vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest	3.82%	13.27%	0.39%	18.22%	-22.57%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	32.32%	26.65%	4.67%	18.84%	-21.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAI and UMMA is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2022	0.87

The correlation between TTAI and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

TTAI vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TTAI	UMMA
Technology	34.4%	42.9%
Consumer Cyclical	15.2%	8.1%
Healthcare	14.8%	16.6%
Industrials	11.1%	13.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	5.6%
Financial Services	6.2%	-
Communication Services	5.8%	0.8%
Basic Materials	2.4%	9.3%
Energy	1.9%	2.9%
Utilities	1.2%	-
Real Estate	-	0.5%

Return for Risk

TTAI vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAI

TTAI Risk / Return Rank: 18
TTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 20

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 76
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAI vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTAI	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	2.59	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	3.44	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.45	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	3.48	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	13.60	-11.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTAI vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAI and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTAI	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	2.59	-2.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.58	-0.29

Drawdowns

TTAI vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, roughly equal to the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTAI	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.17%	-34.17%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-14.93%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.34%	-18.73%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-0.90%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.20%	-9.81%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	3.82%	-0.16%

Volatility

TTAI vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) is 5.92%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that TTAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTAI	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.92%	7.54%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.17%	17.26%	-3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.02%	20.11%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	20.55%	-3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.89%	20.55%	-1.66%

TTAI vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTAI vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than UMMA's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest	2.45%	2.30%	2.13%	2.39%	9.36%	2.01%	0.64%	1.90%	0.92%	0.26%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.93%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTAI and UMMA in my portfolio?

TTAI and UMMA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTAI or UMMA?

UMMA has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to TTAI (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, TTAI or UMMA?

On 3-year performance, UMMA leads with 22.81% vs 9.76% for TTAI. On fees, TTAI is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, TTAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TTAI or UMMA?

Over the 3-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 22.81% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TTAI or UMMA?

TTAI is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TTAI or UMMA?

TTAI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.93% for UMMA.

What is the main difference between TTAI and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.