TTAI vs. IDEV
TTAI (TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TTAI is actively managed, while IDEV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAI returned 1.76%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for IDEV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TTAI charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
TTAI vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAI achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than IDEV's 9.80% return.
TTAI
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- —
TTAI vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 3.82% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 18.30% | 24.52% | -17.73% | 7.27% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 9.80% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAI and IDEV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between TTAI and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
TTAI vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAI
IDEV
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
TTAI
IDEV
Consumer Cyclical
TTAI
IDEV
Healthcare
TTAI
IDEV
Industrials
TTAI
IDEV
Consumer Defensive
TTAI
IDEV
Financial Services
TTAI
IDEV
Communication Services
TTAI
IDEV
Basic Materials
TTAI
IDEV
Energy
TTAI
IDEV
Utilities
TTAI
IDEV
Real Estate
TTAI
-
IDEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAI vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
TTAI
IDEV
TTAI vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTAI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 2.12 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 8.30 | -6.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTAI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.63 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.54 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.55 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
TTAI vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, roughly equal to the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAI and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -34.77% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.00% | -11.20% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.34% | -13.41% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.13% | -29.15% | -4.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -0.19% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -6.56% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.85% | +0.81% |
Volatility
TTAI vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest (TTAI) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) at 4.53%. This indicates that TTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAI | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 4.53% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.17% | 12.12% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 14.50% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 16.26% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 17.27% | +1.62% |
TTAI vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAI has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAI vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
TTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than IDEV's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.10% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% |
TTAI TrimTabs International Free Cash Flow Quality ETF of Benef Interest | 2.45% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAI and IDEV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAI has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to IDEV (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAI dropped -34.17% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.66% vs 1.76% for TTAI. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.66% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for TTAI.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.45% for TTAI.
They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for TTAI and 0.05% for IDEV.
IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAI and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer