TTAC vs. SCHB
Compare and contrast key facts about TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB).
TTAC and SCHB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TTAC is an actively managed fund by TrimTabs. It was launched on Sep 28, 2016. SCHB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
TTAC vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TTAC vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | -0.10% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.23% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | -4.05% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 10.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's -4.05% return.
TTAC
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -4.05%
- 6M
- -1.80%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TTAC vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TTAC vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
TTAC
SCHB
TTAC vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.50 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.23 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.51 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.45 | 7.15 | -2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.61 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.78 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAC and SCHB is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TTAC vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SCHB's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.63% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.18% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
TTAC vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and SCHB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -35.27% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -12.22% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -25.41% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -6.26% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -4.15% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.58% | +0.17% |
Volatility
TTAC vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 5.48%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.48% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 9.75% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.81% | 18.33% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.00% | 17.25% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 18.30% | +0.47% |