TTAC vs. SCHB
TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. TTAC is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAC returned 12.94%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for SCHB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
TTAC vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 10.41% return.
TTAC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
TTAC vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 18.93% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.11% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 10.41% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAC and SCHB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TTAC and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
TTAC vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAC
SCHB
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Technology
TTAC
SCHB
Financial Services
TTAC
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
TTAC
SCHB
Healthcare
TTAC
SCHB
Industrials
TTAC
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
TTAC
SCHB
Communication Services
TTAC
SCHB
Energy
TTAC
SCHB
Basic Materials
TTAC
SCHB
Real Estate
TTAC
SCHB
Utilities
TTAC
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAC vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
TTAC
SCHB
TTAC vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 3.05 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 13.57 | -2.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAC vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -35.27% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -8.91% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -19.34% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -25.41% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.50% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -4.11% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.00% | +0.24% |
Volatility
TTAC vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 4.80%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAC | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 4.80% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 10.00% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 12.77% | +3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 17.34% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 18.37% | +0.38% |
TTAC vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAC vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAC and SCHB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAC has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to SCHB (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.94% vs 12.43% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
TTAC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCHB is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAC and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer