TTAC vs. FTCS
TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and FTCS (First Trust Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTAC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by TrimTabs, while FTCS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the The Capital Strength Index. TTAC is actively managed, while FTCS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TTAC returned 12.94%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for FTCS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for FTCS.
Performance
TTAC vs. FTCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than FTCS's 0.55% return.
TTAC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
FTCS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -1.88%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
TTAC vs. FTCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 18.93% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 22.97% | -14.60% | 30.66% | 18.30% | 26.03% | -6.26% | 15.11% |
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 0.55% | 6.46% | 11.19% | 8.48% | -10.22% | 26.75% | 13.05% | 26.71% | -4.22% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAC and FTCS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TTAC and FTCS has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TTAC vs. FTCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTAC
FTCS
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TTAC
FTCS
Financial Services
TTAC
FTCS
Consumer Cyclical
TTAC
FTCS
Healthcare
TTAC
FTCS
Industrials
TTAC
FTCS
Consumer Defensive
TTAC
FTCS
Communication Services
TTAC
FTCS
Energy
TTAC
FTCS
Basic Materials
TTAC
FTCS
Real Estate
TTAC
FTCS
-
Utilities
TTAC
-
FTCS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAC vs. FTCS — Risk / Return Rank
TTAC
FTCS
TTAC vs. FTCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAC | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 0.71 | +2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 1.63 | +9.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAC vs. FTCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum FTCS drawdown of -53.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and FTCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAC | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -53.64% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -7.74% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | -12.62% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -20.93% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.45% | +6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -6.92% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 3.34% | -1.10% |
Volatility
TTAC vs. FTCS - Volatility Comparison
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to First Trust Capital Strength ETF (FTCS) at 2.99%. This indicates that TTAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAC | FTCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 2.99% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | 7.22% | +5.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 9.95% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 13.14% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 15.55% | +3.20% |
TTAC vs. FTCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FTCS's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAC vs. FTCS - Dividend Comparison
TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than FTCS's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTCS First Trust Capital Strength ETF | 1.12% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.47% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.15% | 1.43% | 1.50% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAC and FTCS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTAC has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to FTCS (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs FTCS's -53.64%.
On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.94% vs 5.80% for FTCS. On fees, FTCS is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FTCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTCS is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.
FTCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
TTAC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTCS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.53% for FTCS.
TTAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTAC and FTCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer