PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAC vs. FPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTAC vs. FPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TTAC having a 17.63% return and FPX slightly higher at 18.28%.


TTAC

1D
0.02%
1M
6.04%
YTD
17.63%
6M
17.18%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*

FPX

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.02%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAC vs. FPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
17.63%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%18.30%26.03%-6.26%15.23%
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
18.28%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%13.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and FPX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.84

The correlation between TTAC and FPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

TTAC vs. FPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTAC
FPX

Technology

29.5%
29.8%

Financial Services

14.5%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
3.5%

Healthcare

11.9%
16.1%

Industrials

9.0%
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
2.3%

Communication Services

6.1%
7.0%

Energy

2.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.0%
4.2%

Utilities

-

6.5%

Technology

TTAC
29.5%
FPX
29.8%

Financial Services

TTAC
14.5%
FPX
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TTAC
12.7%
FPX
3.5%

Healthcare

TTAC
11.9%
FPX
16.1%

Industrials

TTAC
9.0%
FPX
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

TTAC
8.0%
FPX
2.3%

Communication Services

TTAC
6.1%
FPX
7.0%

Energy

TTAC
2.6%
FPX
4.4%

Basic Materials

TTAC
2.3%
FPX
3.3%

Real Estate

TTAC
2.0%
FPX
4.2%

Utilities

TTAC

-

FPX
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAC vs. FPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAC vs. FPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTACFPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.21

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

10.40

-0.99

TTAC vs. FPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and FPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTACFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.71

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.39

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.57

+0.22

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. FPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum FPX drawdown of -56.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and FPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTACFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-56.29%

+21.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-12.28%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-30.88%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-43.14%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.83%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-11.34%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.78%

-1.57%

Volatility

TTAC vs. FPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) is 4.48%, while First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that TTAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTACFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

6.22%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

17.11%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

23.10%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

26.49%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

24.28%

-5.57%

TTAC vs. FPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FPX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTAC vs. FPX - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than FPX's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.49%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.53%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTAC and FPX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to TTAC (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs FPX's -56.29%.

On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 12.77% vs 10.31% for FPX. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.

TTAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.49% for FPX.

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.57% for FPX.

FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAC and FPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer