PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAC vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTAC vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 24.33% return.


TTAC

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.36%
6M
12.42%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.10%

DGRE

1D
1.17%
1M
-2.01%
6M
14.83%
YTD
24.33%
1Y
43.98%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
8.04%
ALL TIME*
5.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$229.67K$448.89K$491.47K
$1.01M$1.13M$1.15M

TTAC vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
15.31%8.07%18.26%22.97%-14.60%30.66%18.30%26.03%-6.26%15.11%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
24.33%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-16.36%8.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and DGRE is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.61

The correlation between TTAC and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TTAC vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TTAC
DGRE

Technology

31.4%
38.6%

Financial Services

14.5%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
2.6%

Healthcare

11.6%
2.6%

Industrials

9.3%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.0%
2.3%

Communication Services

5.0%
0.8%

Energy

2.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.3%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

TTAC
31.4%
DGRE
38.6%

Financial Services

TTAC
14.5%
DGRE
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TTAC
11.8%
DGRE
2.6%

Healthcare

TTAC
11.6%
DGRE
2.6%

Industrials

TTAC
9.3%
DGRE
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

TTAC
8.0%
DGRE
2.3%

Communication Services

TTAC
5.0%
DGRE
0.8%

Energy

TTAC
2.6%
DGRE
1.1%

Basic Materials

TTAC
2.3%
DGRE
4.4%

Real Estate

TTAC
2.0%
DGRE
0.3%

Utilities

TTAC

-

DGRE
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAC vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTAC
TTAC Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TTAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTAC vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTACDGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.23

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

10.12

-1.21

TTAC vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and DGRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTACDGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-36.95%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-13.68%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-20.65%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-33.43%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-8.09%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.95%

-11.93%

+6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

4.36%

-2.03%

Volatility

TTAC vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) is 4.80%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that TTAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTACDGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

9.02%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

22.59%

-8.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.82%

24.31%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

19.08%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

19.99%

-1.24%

TTAC vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTAC vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DGRE's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.33%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.54%0.62%0.70%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTAC and DGRE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to TTAC (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAC dropped -34.95% vs DGRE's -36.95%.

On 5-year performance, TTAC leads with 11.12% vs 8.18% for DGRE. On fees, DGRE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, TTAC has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TTAC has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.

DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.54% for TTAC.

They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAC and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer