TT vs. TXRH
TT (Trane Technologies plc) and TXRH (Texas Roadhouse, Inc.) are both stocks. TT operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while TXRH operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, TT returned 23.26%/yr vs 16.96%/yr for TXRH. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TT vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than TXRH's 19.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TT has outperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 23.26%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively lower 16.96% annualized return.
TT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 5.63%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 23.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.40%
TXRH
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 17.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.75%
TT vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 20.85% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 19.26% | -6.57% | 49.78% | 37.15% | 4.16% | 15.71% | 39.83% | -3.62% | 15.11% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TT and TXRH is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2004 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TT and TXRH has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TT:
$103.49B
TXRH:
$12.90B
TT:
$12.96
TXRH:
$6.27
TT:
36.14
TXRH:
31.32
TT:
1.65
TXRH:
1.95
TT:
4.85
TXRH:
2.15
TT:
$21.60B
TXRH:
$6.06B
TT:
$7.76B
TXRH:
$1.14B
TT:
$4.25B
TXRH:
$701.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TT vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank
TT
TXRH
TT vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TT | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.07 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.43 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 0.84 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TT vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, roughly equal to the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and TXRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TT | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -76.59% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -19.61% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.44% | -24.82% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.53% | -30.45% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.13% | -58.04% | +6.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -1.75% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.81% | -16.11% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.21% | 10.07% | +0.14% |
Volatility
TT vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison
Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TT | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.88% | 9.76% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.99% | 23.19% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.91% | 29.99% | -1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.54% | 30.54% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 35.73% | -7.37% |
Dividends
TT vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than TXRH's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.85% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 2.02% | 1.34% | 0.46% | 2.13% | 1.68% | 1.59% | 1.58% | 1.90% |
Financials
TT vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TT vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
TXRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 499.53M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
TXRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.34M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
TXRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 123.43M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TT and TXRH have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TT has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to TXRH (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TT dropped -77.91% vs TXRH's -76.59%.
TXRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TT and TXRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer