TT vs. ETN
TT (Trane Technologies plc) and ETN (Eaton Corporation plc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, TT returned 23.76%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for ETN. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TT vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TT achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 23.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TT having a 23.76% annualized return and ETN not far behind at 23.38%.
TT
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 17.69%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 37.71%
- 5Y*
- 21.39%
- 10Y*
- 23.76%
ETN
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 23.61%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 23.65%
- 10Y*
- 23.38%
TT vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT Trane Technologies plc | 18.29% | 6.38% | 52.97% | 47.39% | -15.34% | 41.02% | 11.26% | 48.32% | 4.41% | 21.27% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 23.61% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TT and ETN is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.54 |
The correlation between TT and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TT:
$102.24B
ETN:
$152.33B
TT:
$12.94
ETN:
$10.22
TT:
35.43
ETN:
38.28
TT:
1.62
ETN:
2.08
TT:
4.75
ETN:
5.36
TT:
11.87
ETN:
7.71
TT:
$21.60B
ETN:
$28.52B
TT:
$7.76B
ETN:
$7.87B
TT:
$4.25B
ETN:
$4.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TT vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
TT
ETN
TT vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trane Technologies plc (TT) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TT | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.13 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.04 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.89 | 2.25 | -1.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TT vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TT drawdown since its inception was -77.91%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TT and ETN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TT | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.91% | -68.95% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.97% | -19.14% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.44% | -34.46% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.53% | -34.46% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.13% | -44.55% | -6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -9.36% | +2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -14.89% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 8.86% | +1.26% |
Volatility
TT vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trane Technologies plc (TT) is 9.05%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 13.57%. This indicates that TT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TT | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.05% | 13.57% | -4.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.82% | 26.78% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.50% | 33.48% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.38% | 30.24% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.34% | 30.10% | -1.76% |
Dividends
TT vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
TT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than ETN's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.09% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
TT Trane Technologies plc | 0.87% | 0.97% | 0.91% | 1.23% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.81% | 2.10% |
Financials
TT vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trane Technologies plc and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TT vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
TT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a gross profit of 1.73B and revenue of 4.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported an operating income of 776.10M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trane Technologies plc reported a net income of 584.40M and revenue of 4.97B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 866.00M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TT and ETN have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETN has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to TT (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TT dropped -77.91% vs ETN's -68.95%.
ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TT and ETN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer