TSYY vs. XYLD
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TSYY is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -9.90% vs 18.90% for XYLD. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
TSYY vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -23.02% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 8.05% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- 6M
- -22.45%
- YTD
- -23.02%
- 1Y
- -9.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.20%
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 1Y
- 18.90%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $760.06K | $828.41K | $1.81M | |
| $36.93M | $37.58M | $32.35M |
TSYY vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -23.02% | -15.96% | -3.30% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 8.05% | 8.02% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and XYLD is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TSYY and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
XYLD
TSYY vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.56 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 3.40 | -3.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 17.69 | -18.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -33.46% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.02% | -5.29% | -27.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.57% | 0.00% | -41.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -3.68% | -23.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.04% | 1.02% | +17.02% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.92%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 1.92% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 5.97% | +11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.54% | 7.13% | +22.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 11.27% | +25.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 14.15% | +22.26% |
TSYY vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 256.16%, more than XYLD's 10.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 246.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.53% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and XYLD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to XYLD (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -42.66% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 1-year performance, XYLD leads with 18.90% vs -9.90% for TSYY. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 18.90% return vs -9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 246.79%, compared with 10.53% for XYLD.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer