TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L
TSWE.L (VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - TSWE.L tracks the Solactive World Equal Weight Screened Index while JPLG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TSWE.L returned 10.47%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for JPLG.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TSWE.L is traded in USD, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSWE.L having a 11.74% return and JPLG.L slightly higher at 11.99%.
TSWE.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.36%
JPLG.L
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 21.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.84%
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSWE.L VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.74% | 27.64% | 9.78% | 20.41% | -17.42% | 22.23% | 23.38% | 10.66% |
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 11.99% | 18.42% | 10.23% | 12.69% | -10.05% | 23.54% | 5.71% | 6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSWE.L and JPLG.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TSWE.L and JPLG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Technology
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Healthcare
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Industrials
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Cyclical
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Communication Services
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Real Estate
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Basic Materials
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Consumer Defensive
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Utilities
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Energy
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
TSWE.L
JPLG.L
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSWE.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 3.22 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 12.07 | -3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSWE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than JPLG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.L and JPLG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSWE.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -35.38% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -6.61% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -12.54% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -21.57% | -6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.46% | -0.45% | -20.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -4.43% | -27.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.76% | +1.05% |
Volatility
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.92%. This indicates that TSWE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSWE.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 1.92% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 7.10% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.34% | 9.11% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 13.12% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 15.72% | +11.96% |
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSWE.L and JPLG.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TSWE.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
TSWE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while JPLG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSWE.L VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.28% | 2.15% | 2.33% | 4.41% | 7.06% | 9.31% | 2.86% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSWE.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSWE.L and JPLG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
TSWE.L tracks Solactive World Equal Weight Screened Index, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan.
Find the right allocation for TSWE.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer