PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSWE.L is traded in USD, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSWE.L achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 29.21% return.


TSWE.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.24%
6M
11.06%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
0.54%

IWVG.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-4.12%
6M
25.30%
YTD
29.21%
1Y
56.72%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
16.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
13.54%27.64%9.78%20.41%-17.42%22.23%23.38%-61.63%-5.75%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
29.21%41.17%4.80%19.04%-9.76%20.14%-4.01%19.28%-16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TSWE.L and IWVG.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2018

0.81

The correlation between TSWE.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSWE.L
TSWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSWE.LIWVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.60

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

6.55

-4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

23.13

-13.58

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSWE.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSWE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than IWVG.L's maximum drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSWE.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-35.79%

-41.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-8.62%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-14.64%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-26.94%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.17%

-4.24%

-14.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-6.64%

-25.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.45%

+0.35%

Volatility

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) is 3.58%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that TSWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSWE.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

6.03%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

13.95%

-1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

16.24%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

15.95%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

17.66%

+10.01%

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSWE.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

TSWE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than IWVG.L's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.93%2.48%3.12%3.22%3.11%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
1.81%1.89%2.28%2.15%2.33%4.41%7.06%9.31%2.86%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSWE.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IWVG.L.

TSWE.L tracks VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF, while IWVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSWE.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSWE.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer