PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSWE.L vs. FLES.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSWE.L is traded in USD, while FLES.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSWE.L achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than FLES.L's -1.49% return.


TSWE.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.24%
6M
11.06%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
0.54%

FLES.L

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.93%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-1.49%
1Y
0.66%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
13.54%27.64%9.78%20.41%-17.42%22.23%23.38%-61.63%-7.09%
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF
-1.49%16.13%-2.23%6.56%-5.88%-6.70%8.72%-1.43%-1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TSWE.L and FLES.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSWE.L
TSWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FLES.L
FLES.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FLES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSWE.LFLES.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.02

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.13

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

0.28

+9.27

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the FLES.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSWE.L and FLES.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSWE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than FLES.L's maximum drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.L and FLES.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSWE.LFLES.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-22.21%

-54.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-5.08%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-7.56%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-19.33%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.17%

-3.98%

-15.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-6.60%

-25.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.39%

+0.41%

Volatility

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L) at 1.61%. This indicates that TSWE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSWE.LFLES.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

1.61%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

4.56%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

6.22%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

7.64%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

7.25%

+20.42%

Dividends

TSWE.L vs. FLES.L - Dividend Comparison

TSWE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FLES.L's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLES.L
Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF
1.92%2.62%2.55%1.20%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
1.81%1.89%2.28%2.15%2.33%4.41%7.06%9.31%2.86%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSWE.L and FLES.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSWE.L tracks VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF, while FLES.L tracks Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSWE.L and FLES.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer