PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSWE.AS achieves a 13.49% return, which is significantly higher than TRET.AS's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.AS has outperformed TRET.AS with an annualized return of 12.01%, while TRET.AS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.57% annualized return.


TSWE.AS

1D
-0.19%
1M
7.45%
YTD
13.49%
6M
16.16%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
12.01%

TRET.AS

1D
0.49%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
5.12%
6M
3.98%
1Y
8.27%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
3.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF
13.49%13.10%17.22%16.38%-13.18%29.50%5.58%26.46%-5.21%8.51%
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
5.12%1.05%8.21%9.09%-21.18%40.50%-14.55%21.60%0.17%-3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSWE.AS and TRET.AS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2013

0.61

The correlation between TSWE.AS and TRET.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSWE.AS
TSWE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TRET.AS
TRET.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSWE.ASTRET.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.12

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

1.01

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.78

3.28

+9.50

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSWE.AS and TRET.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSWE.ASTRET.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.69

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.21

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.22

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

-0.00

+0.74

Drawdowns

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSWE.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum TRET.AS drawdown of -99.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.AS and TRET.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSWE.ASTRET.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-99.19%

+65.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-8.09%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-17.23%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.53%

-30.50%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-41.80%

+8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-97.59%

+97.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-96.63%

+91.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

2.51%

-0.46%

Volatility

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSWE.ASTRET.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.81%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

9.01%

+0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

11.81%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

14.87%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

16.25%

-1.32%

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSWE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TRET.AS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TSWE.AS vs. TRET.AS - Dividend Comparison

TSWE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than TRET.AS's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
4.51%3.66%3.41%3.67%4.68%1.78%4.43%3.33%4.31%3.16%3.13%2.55%
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF
2.57%1.94%2.18%2.23%2.38%1.64%1.88%2.34%2.45%2.09%1.85%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSWE.AS and TRET.AS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSWE.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSWE.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.AS.

TSWE.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while TRET.AS is REIT. TSWE.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TRET.AS tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSWE.AS and 0.25% for TRET.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSWE.AS and TRET.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer