TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L).
TSWE.AS and MXWS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSWE.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2013. MXWS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009. Both TSWE.AS and MXWS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TSWE.AS or MXWS.L.
Key characteristics
| TSWE.AS | MXWS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.07% | 12.42% |
| 1Y Return | 17.83% | 18.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.26% | 9.05% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.11% | 11.93% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.40% | 17.93% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.65 | 1.78 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.58% | 10.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.67% | -24.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.77% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSWE.AS and MXWS.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSWE.AS having a 12.07% return and MXWS.L slightly higher at 12.42%. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.AS has underperformed MXWS.L with an annualized return of 9.40%, while MXWS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSWE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MXWS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L - Dividend Comparison
TSWE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while MXWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSWE.AS VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 2.18% | 2.23% | 2.38% | 1.64% | 1.88% | 2.34% | 2.45% | 2.09% | 1.85% | 1.87% | 5.46% | 0.31% |
MXWS.L Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSWE.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, which is greater than MXWS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.AS and MXWS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TSWE.AS vs. MXWS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) is 3.54%, while Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (MXWS.L) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that TSWE.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXWS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.