TRET.AS vs. PFFR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR).
TRET.AS and PFFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRET.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. PFFR is a passively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners that tracks the performance of the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2017. Both TRET.AS and PFFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TRET.AS or PFFR.
Key characteristics
| TRET.AS | PFFR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 13.61% | 14.16% |
| 1Y Return | 26.40% | 29.78% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.81% | 1.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.58% | 2.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.32 | 3.05 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.43 | 4.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.33 | 1.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.27 | 18.52 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.29% | 1.58% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.28% | 9.60% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.19% | -53.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -97.90% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.AS and PFFR is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TRET.AS vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRET.AS having a 13.61% return and PFFR slightly higher at 14.16%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRET.AS vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRET.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TRET.AS vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TRET.AS vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PFFR's 7.17% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.30% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 1.78% | 4.43% | 3.33% | 4.31% | 3.16% | 3.13% | 2.55% | 2.70% | 3.01% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 7.17% | 7.72% | 9.65% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 5.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TRET.AS vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.AS drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than PFFR's maximum drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.AS and PFFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TRET.AS vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) at 1.94%. This indicates that TRET.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.