TRET.AS vs. REET
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET).
TRET.AS and REET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TRET.AS is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. Both TRET.AS and REET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TRET.AS or REET.
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.AS and REET is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TRET.AS vs. REET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TRET.AS:
0.55
REET:
0.69
TRET.AS:
0.81
REET:
1.04
TRET.AS:
1.11
REET:
1.14
TRET.AS:
0.08
REET:
0.52
TRET.AS:
1.62
REET:
1.91
TRET.AS:
4.73%
REET:
6.02%
TRET.AS:
13.77%
REET:
16.66%
TRET.AS:
-99.19%
REET:
-44.59%
TRET.AS:
-97.77%
REET:
-11.95%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRET.AS achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than REET's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TRET.AS has underperformed REET with an annualized return of 2.48%, while REET has yielded a comparatively higher 3.32% annualized return.
TRET.AS
-1.53%
6.61%
-2.53%
7.58%
6.54%
2.48%
REET
2.49%
11.39%
-1.58%
10.25%
7.20%
3.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRET.AS vs. REET - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRET.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than REET's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TRET.AS vs. REET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TRET.AS
REET
TRET.AS vs. REET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and iShares Global REIT ETF (REET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TRET.AS vs. REET - Dividend Comparison
TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than REET's 3.54% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.70% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 1.78% | 4.43% | 3.33% | 4.31% | 3.16% | 3.13% | 2.55% | 2.70% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.54% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
TRET.AS vs. REET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.AS drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than REET's maximum drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.AS and REET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TRET.AS vs. REET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) is 6.65%, while iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that TRET.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.