TSUMX vs. SMIFX
TSUMX (Thornburg Summit Fund Class I) and SMIFX (Sound Mind Investing Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, TSUMX returned 9.17%/yr vs 6.02%/yr for SMIFX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSUMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for SMIFX.
Performance
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSUMX achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly lower than SMIFX's 17.18% return.
TSUMX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SMIFX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 17.18%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSUMX Thornburg Summit Fund Class I | 10.05% | 20.51% | 11.42% | 12.31% | -9.79% | 14.63% | 27.80% | 9.43% |
SMIFX Sound Mind Investing Fund | 17.18% | 3.16% | 16.65% | 5.17% | -8.93% | 11.15% | 20.76% | 10.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSUMX and SMIFX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between TSUMX and SMIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSUMX vs. SMIFX — Risk / Return Rank
TSUMX
SMIFX
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) and Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSUMX | SMIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.32 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 2.83 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.63 | 9.07 | +8.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSUMX | SMIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.30 | 1.81 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.21 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.32 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSUMX drawdown since its inception was -28.87%, smaller than the maximum SMIFX drawdown of -54.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSUMX and SMIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSUMX | SMIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.87% | -54.33% | +25.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -7.42% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.37% | -19.98% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.87% | -41.36% | +12.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -8.50% | +8.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -14.28% | +6.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 2.31% | -0.85% |
Volatility
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Summit Fund Class I (TSUMX) is 2.16%, while Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) has a volatility of 3.04%. This indicates that TSUMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSUMX | SMIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 3.04% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 8.90% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.85% | 11.63% | -3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 29.03% | -15.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 24.18% | -10.48% |
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSUMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SMIFX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSUMX vs. SMIFX - Dividend Comparison
TSUMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than SMIFX's 4.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIFX Sound Mind Investing Fund | 4.55% | 5.33% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 0.97% | 46.86% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 26.02% | 10.06% | 0.00% | 14.94% |
TSUMX Thornburg Summit Fund Class I | 6.20% | 6.22% | 4.86% | 2.03% | 2.61% | 19.21% | 5.11% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSUMX and SMIFX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMIFX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to TSUMX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSUMX dropped -28.87% vs SMIFX's -54.33%.
TSUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSUMX and SMIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer