TSPY vs. QQA
TSPY (TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSPY returned 26.85% vs 31.26% for QQA. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSPY charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
TSPY vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSPY achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 14.23% return.
TSPY
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 26.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 5.87%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 31.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSPY vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 8.92% | 17.29% | 6.14% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.23% | 17.24% | 9.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSPY and QQA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TSPY and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSPY vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
TSPY
QQA
TSPY vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 3.59 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.47 | 16.10 | -3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.50 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
TSPY vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSPY drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPY and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -19.73% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -8.76% | -0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.39% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -2.44% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.95% | +0.21% |
Volatility
TSPY vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) is 2.55%, while Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that TSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.55% | 2.93% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 9.68% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.68% | 12.59% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 18.25% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 18.25% | -2.21% |
TSPY vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSPY has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSPY vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
TSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%, more than QQA's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.32% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF | 13.71% | 13.69% | 3.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSPY and QQA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQA has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to TSPY (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPY dropped -18.02% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 31.26% vs 26.85% for TSPY. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 31.26% return vs 26.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for TSPY.
TSPY has the higher dividend yield at 13.71%, compared with 9.32% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TSPY and 0.29% for QQA.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSPY and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer