PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPY vs. BTCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSPY vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPY achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -21.19% return.


TSPY

1D
1.42%
1M
1.82%
YTD
8.33%
6M
8.97%
1Y
24.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTCI

1D
4.45%
1M
-14.41%
YTD
-21.19%
6M
-19.55%
1Y
-31.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSPY vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSPY
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF
8.33%17.29%-0.04%
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
-21.19%-1.09%26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TSPY and BTCI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSPY vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPY
TSPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCI
BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPY vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSPYBTCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.88

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.67

+3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

-1.21

+12.38

TSPY vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPY and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSPY vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPY drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPY and BTCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPYBTCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.02%

-47.16%

+29.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-47.16%

+37.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-41.72%

+40.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-15.72%

+13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

26.28%

-24.07%

Volatility

TSPY vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) is 4.32%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 12.19%. This indicates that TSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSPYBTCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

12.19%

-7.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.49%

31.46%

-21.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

39.73%

-27.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

40.37%

-24.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

40.37%

-24.23%

TSPY vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPY has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSPY vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

TSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, less than BTCI's 42.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BTCI
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF
42.31%36.46%6.76%
TSPY
TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF
13.79%13.69%3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSPY and BTCI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTCI has higher volatility (12.19%) compared to TSPY (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPY dropped -18.02% vs BTCI's -47.16%.

On 1-year performance, TSPY leads with 24.68% vs -31.68% for BTCI. On fees, TSPY is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, TSPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSPY has performed better with a 24.68% return vs -31.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSPY is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 42.31%, compared with 13.79% for TSPY.

TSPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TSPY and 0.99% for BTCI.

TSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSPY and BTCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer