TSPX vs. EAOM
TSPX (Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. TSPX is actively managed, while EAOM is passively managed. Over the past year, TSPX returned 21.64% vs 14.38% for EAOM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSPX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOM.
Performance
TSPX vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSPX achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's 5.30% return.
TSPX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 21.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EAOM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 14.38%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
TSPX vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSPX Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF | 8.52% | 15.46% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 5.30% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSPX and EAOM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TSPX and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSPX vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank
TSPX
EAOM
TSPX vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSPX | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.79 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.91 | 12.30 | +2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSPX | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 2.25 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.76 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
TSPX vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSPX drawdown since its inception was -7.80%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPX and EAOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSPX | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -20.73% | +12.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -5.17% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.24% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -4.96% | +3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 1.17% | +0.29% |
Volatility
TSPX vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) have volatilities of 2.25% and 2.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSPX | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.25% | 2.27% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.08% | 5.24% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.12% | 6.44% | +2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 8.06% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 7.90% | +2.88% |
TSPX vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSPX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSPX vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison
TSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than EAOM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.78% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% |
TSPX Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF | 1.98% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSPX and EAOM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAOM has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to TSPX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPX dropped -7.80% vs EAOM's -20.73%.
On 1-year performance, TSPX leads with 21.64% vs 14.38% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSPX has performed better with a 21.64% return vs 14.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSPX.
EAOM has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.98% for TSPX.
They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSPX and 0.18% for EAOM.
TSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSPX and EAOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer