PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPX vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSPX vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSPX vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPX achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's -0.60% return.


TSPX

1D
0.66%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-0.76%
1Y
15.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAOM

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSPX vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSPX vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPX
TSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPX vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSPXEAOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.37

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

1.99

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.28

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.99

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.53

8.33

+1.19

TSPX vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPX and EAOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSPXEAOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.37

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.65

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between TSPX and EAOM is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TSPX vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

TSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than EAOM's 2.91% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
2.21%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.91%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%

Drawdowns

TSPX vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPX drawdown since its inception was -7.80%, smaller than the maximum EAOM drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPX and EAOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPXEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-20.73%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-5.67%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-3.31%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-5.09%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.35%

+0.26%

Volatility

TSPX vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 3.27%. This indicates that TSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSPXEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.27%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

4.82%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

8.04%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.04%

8.01%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.04%

7.91%

+3.13%