TSMZ vs. METD

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -58.71% vs 10.85% for METD. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

TSMZ vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -38.37% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 8.96% return.

TSMZ

• 1D: -6.92%
• 1M: -14.31%
• YTD: -38.37%
• 6M: -41.26%
• 1Y: -58.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METD

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 4.62%
• YTD: 8.96%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMZ vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	-38.37%	-41.91%	-11.25%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	8.96%	-17.33%	-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMZ and METD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	0.41

The correlation between TSMZ and METD shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TSMZ vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMZ

TSMZ Risk / Return Rank: 0
TSMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 14
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 16
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMZ vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMZ	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.55	0.36	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.67	0.74	-3.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.71	1.10	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	0.54	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.62	1.19	-2.81

TSMZ vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.55, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMZ and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSMZ vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -73.06%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMZ	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.06%	-46.03%	-27.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-58.71%	-24.38%	-34.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.06%	-29.97%	-43.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.52%	-28.60%	-9.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.76%	11.03%	+24.73%

Volatility

TSMZ vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) has a higher volatility of 14.02% compared to Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) at 12.88%. This indicates that TSMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMZ	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.02%	12.88%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.74%	28.34%	+1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.54%	36.57%	+0.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.95%	36.68%	+4.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.95%	36.68%	+4.27%

TSMZ vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMZ vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than METD's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.51%	3.35%	2.30%
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	5.68%	4.88%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMZ and METD in my portfolio?

TSMZ and METD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMZ or METD?

TSMZ has higher volatility (14.02%) compared to METD (12.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -73.06% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, TSMZ or METD?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 10.85% vs -58.71% for TSMZ. On fees, TSMZ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, METD has been the lower-risk option at 12.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMZ or METD?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 10.85% return vs -58.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMZ or METD?

TSMZ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMZ or METD?

TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 2.51% for METD.

What is the main difference between TSMZ and METD?

Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.