TSMZ vs. DARP
TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while DARP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Grizzle. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -59.11% vs 77.10% for DARP. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DARP.
Performance
TSMZ vs. DARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -38.97% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 32.11% return.
TSMZ
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -15.14%
- YTD
- -38.97%
- 6M
- -41.14%
- 1Y
- -59.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DARP
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 32.11%
- 6M
- 32.85%
- 1Y
- 77.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMZ vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | -38.97% | -41.91% | -11.25% |
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 32.11% | 40.19% | 6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMZ and DARP is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.74 |
The correlation between TSMZ and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMZ vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank
TSMZ
DARP
TSMZ vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMZ | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.70 | 1.49 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 6.56 | -7.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | 23.42 | -25.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMZ vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -73.32%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and DARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMZ | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.32% | -30.27% | -43.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.01% | -11.82% | -47.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.32% | -1.18% | -72.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -4.64% | -33.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.95% | 3.30% | +32.65% |
Volatility
TSMZ vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) has a higher volatility of 13.95% compared to Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) at 9.63%. This indicates that TSMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMZ | DARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 9.63% | +4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.48% | 18.67% | +10.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.56% | 24.43% | +13.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.91% | 26.36% | +14.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.91% | 26.36% | +14.55% |
TSMZ vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMZ vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison
TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than DARP's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.43% | 1.93% | 0.32% |
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | 5.74% | 4.88% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMZ and DARP have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMZ has higher volatility (13.95%) compared to DARP (9.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -73.32% vs DARP's -30.27%.
On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 77.10% vs -59.11% for TSMZ. On fees, DARP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DARP has been the lower-risk option at 9.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 77.10% return vs -59.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DARP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.
TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.33% for DARP.
TSMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DARP is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.75% for DARP.
DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMZ and DARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer