TSMY vs. FBY
TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) and FBY (YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMY returned 60.64% vs -24.10% for FBY. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSMY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for FBY.
Performance
TSMY vs. FBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMY achieves a 30.47% return, which is significantly higher than FBY's -15.55% return.
TSMY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- YTD
- 30.47%
- 1Y
- 60.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 42.46%
FBY
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -21.00%
- YTD
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- -24.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.42M | $1.53M | $1.62M | |
| $2.14M | $3.13M | $3.04M |
TSMY vs. FBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.47% | 41.00% | 8.05% |
FBY YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF | -15.55% | 1.98% | 15.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMY and FBY is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMY vs. FBY — Risk / Return Rank
TSMY
FBY
TSMY vs. FBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMY | FBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.87 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | -0.88 | +4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | -1.61 | +12.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMY vs. FBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMY drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, roughly equal to the maximum FBY drawdown of -31.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMY and FBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMY | FBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.15% | -31.53% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.86% | -29.50% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -27.42% | +15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -8.56% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 16.09% | -10.76% |
Volatility
TSMY vs. FBY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) is 11.98%, while YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF (FBY) has a volatility of 13.27%. This indicates that TSMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMY | FBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.98% | 13.27% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.90% | 25.65% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.77% | 32.93% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 29.49% | +5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 29.49% | +5.15% |
TSMY vs. FBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FBY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMY vs. FBY - Dividend Comparison
TSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.31%, less than FBY's 62.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBY YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF | 62.78% | 55.43% | 53.89% | 8.31% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 58.31% | 56.76% | 13.71% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMY and FBY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBY has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to TSMY (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMY dropped -31.15% vs FBY's -31.53%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 60.64% vs -24.10% for FBY. On fees, FBY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 11.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 60.64% return vs -24.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSMY.
FBY has the higher dividend yield at 62.78%, compared with 58.31% for TSMY.
Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSMY and 0.99% for FBY.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMY and FBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer