TSMU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

TSMU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 45.22% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

TSMU

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -15.84%
• 6M: 25.27%
• YTD: 45.22%
• 1Y: 118.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 75.77%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	$5.79M	$7.14M	$6.95M

TSMU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	45.22%	16.45%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and LINT is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.46

TSMU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSMU	LINT
Technology	66.6%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSMU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSMU

TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 62
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 53
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 66

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSMU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.05	—	—

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.73%	-69.02%	+5.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.97%	-62.88%	+31.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.13%	-23.85%	+7.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSMU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.24%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.66%	169.51%	-87.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.08%	169.51%	-85.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.08%	169.51%	-85.43%

TSMU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

TSMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMU and LINT in my portfolio?

TSMU and LINT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSMU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMU or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for TSMU.

What is the main difference between TSMU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.97% for LINT.