TSMG vs. TSLT
TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) and TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMG returned 218.18% vs -14.18% for TSLT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLT.
Performance
TSMG vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMG achieves a 83.76% return, which is significantly higher than TSLT's -40.17% return.
TSMG
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 15.01%
- YTD
- 83.76%
- 6M
- 89.30%
- 1Y
- 218.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -24.84%
- YTD
- -40.17%
- 6M
- -48.80%
- 1Y
- -14.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 83.76% | 71.03% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -40.17% | -27.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMG and TSLT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMG vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank
TSMG
TSLT
TSMG vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMG | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.04 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.22 | -0.26 | +6.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.84 | -0.52 | +20.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMG vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMG drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, smaller than the maximum TSLT drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMG and TSLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMG | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.67% | -83.16% | +19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.29% | -55.08% | +19.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.88% | -70.94% | +59.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -50.65% | +34.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.05% | 27.86% | -16.81% |
Volatility
TSMG vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a higher volatility of 32.95% compared to T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) at 28.11%. This indicates that TSMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMG | TSLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.95% | 28.11% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.72% | 56.58% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.79% | 87.52% | -10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.11% | 116.81% | -33.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.11% | 116.81% | -33.70% |
TSMG vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMG vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison
TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 6.25% | 11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMG and TSLT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMG has higher volatility (32.95%) compared to TSLT (28.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMG dropped -63.67% vs TSLT's -83.16%.
On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 218.18% vs -14.18% for TSLT. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSLT has been the lower-risk option at 28.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 218.18% return vs -14.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLT.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSMG and 1.05% for TSLT.
TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMG and TSLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer