TSME vs. SCHA
TSME (Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSME is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Thrivent, while SCHA is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. TSME is actively managed, while SCHA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSME returned 21.67%/yr vs 18.92%/yr for SCHA. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
TSME vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 16.53% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 19.79% return.
TSME
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 16.53%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- 1Y
- 36.32%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHA
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
TSME vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 16.53% | 13.79% | 18.98% | 17.82% | 2.41% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 19.79% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSME and SCHA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TSME and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSME vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSME
SCHA
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
TSME
SCHA
Technology
TSME
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
TSME
SCHA
Financial Services
TSME
SCHA
Healthcare
TSME
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
TSME
SCHA
Basic Materials
TSME
SCHA
Utilities
TSME
SCHA
Energy
TSME
SCHA
Communication Services
TSME
-
SCHA
Real Estate
TSME
-
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSME vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
TSME
SCHA
TSME vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSME | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 4.26 | -1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 15.66 | -7.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSME | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 2.25 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.57 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
TSME vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSME | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -42.41% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -9.50% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -27.29% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.58% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -7.58% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 2.58% | +1.71% |
Volatility
TSME vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 5.08%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSME | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 5.08% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.07% | 12.83% | +4.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.13% | 18.01% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 21.93% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 22.71% | -1.03% |
TSME vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSME vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SCHA's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.38% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSME and SCHA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSME has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to SCHA (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 3-year performance, TSME leads with 21.67% vs 18.92% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSME has performed better with a 21.67% return vs 18.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.
TSME is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSME and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer