TSME vs. AMRC
TSME (Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF) is Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Thrivent, while AMRC (Ameresco, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, TSME returned 21.81%/yr vs -7.77%/yr for AMRC. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TSME vs. AMRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly lower than AMRC's 23.15% return.
TSME
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMRC
- 1D
- 4.25%
- 1M
- 15.02%
- YTD
- 23.15%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 166.59%
- 3Y*
- -7.77%
- 5Y*
- -8.16%
- 10Y*
- 22.35%
TSME vs. AMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 16.94% | 13.79% | 18.98% | 17.82% | 2.41% |
AMRC Ameresco, Inc. | 23.15% | 24.74% | -25.86% | -44.57% | -17.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSME and AMRC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TSME and AMRC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSME vs. AMRC — Risk / Return Rank
TSME
AMRC
TSME vs. AMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSME | AMRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 2.05 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 3.05 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.38 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.64 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 6.85 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSME | AMRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.05 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.21 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
TSME vs. AMRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum AMRC drawdown of -91.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and AMRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSME | AMRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -91.12% | +64.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -44.48% | +29.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -86.26% | +59.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -91.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -63.01% | +63.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -42.66% | +37.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 23.61% | -19.32% |
Volatility
TSME vs. AMRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) is 7.63%, while Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) has a volatility of 23.89%. This indicates that TSME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSME | AMRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 23.89% | -16.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 44.16% | -27.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 81.89% | -60.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 74.10% | -52.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 63.19% | -41.50% |
Dividends
TSME vs. AMRC - Dividend Comparison
TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while AMRC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMRC Ameresco, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.38% | 0.53% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSME and AMRC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMRC has higher volatility (23.89%) compared to TSME (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs AMRC's -91.12%.
AMRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSME and AMRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer