TSME vs. QIDX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSME (Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSME returned 37.53% vs 12.09% for QIDX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.

Performance

TSME vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 7.83% return.

TSME

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: 7.53%
• YTD: 20.35%
• 6M: 17.91%
• 1Y: 37.53%
• 3Y*: 22.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QIDX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 12.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSME vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF	20.35%	13.79%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	7.83%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TSME and QIDX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.82

The correlation between TSME and QIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSME vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSME

TSME Risk / Return Rank: 54
TSME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TSME Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TSME Omega Ratio Rank: 51
TSME Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
TSME Martin Ratio Rank: 54

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 35
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSME vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSME	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.10	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	1.63	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	1.75	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.75	5.80	+2.95

TSME vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSME Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSME and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSME vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and QIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSME	QIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.59%	-14.99%	-11.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.72%	-6.92%	-7.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-1.29%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-2.24%	-2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.30%	2.09%	+2.21%

Volatility

TSME vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 3.01%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSME	QIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.80%	3.01%	+4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.97%	8.53%	+9.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.93%	11.15%	+10.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.82%	14.54%	+7.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.82%	14.54%	+7.28%

TSME vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSME vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than QIDX's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF	0.14%	0.17%	0.38%	0.53%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSME and QIDX in my portfolio?

TSME and QIDX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSME or QIDX?

TSME has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to QIDX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

Which ETF is better, TSME or QIDX?

On 1-year performance, TSME leads with 37.53% vs 12.09% for QIDX. On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSME or QIDX?

Over the 1-year period, TSME has performed better with a 37.53% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSME or QIDX?

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSME or QIDX?

QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.

What is the main difference between TSME and QIDX?

They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.50% for QIDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.