TSME vs. MOO
TSME (Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSME is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Thrivent, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. TSME is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSME returned 21.81%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for MOO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSME charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
TSME vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 9.58% return.
TSME
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 6M
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 21.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 12.22%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
TSME vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 16.94% | 13.79% | 18.98% | 17.82% | 2.41% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 9.58% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | 3.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSME and MOO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022 | 0.64 |
The correlation between TSME and MOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TSME vs. MOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSME
MOO
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
TSME
MOO
Technology
TSME
MOO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSME
MOO
-
Financial Services
TSME
MOO
-
Healthcare
TSME
MOO
Consumer Defensive
TSME
MOO
Basic Materials
TSME
MOO
Utilities
TSME
MOO
-
Energy
TSME
MOO
-
Communication Services
TSME
-
MOO
-
Real Estate
TSME
-
MOO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSME vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
TSME
MOO
TSME vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSME | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 0.88 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 1.34 | +1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.16 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 1.54 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 3.90 | +5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSME | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 0.88 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.22 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
TSME vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSME | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.59% | -69.53% | +42.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.72% | -8.45% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.59% | -26.83% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.89% | +17.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -16.97% | +11.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 3.34% | +0.95% |
Volatility
TSME vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) at 4.05%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSME | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 4.05% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.08% | 10.56% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 13.89% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 17.12% | +4.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 18.20% | +3.49% |
TSME vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSME vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than MOO's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.25% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
TSME Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.38% | 0.53% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSME and MOO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSME has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to MOO (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 3-year performance, TSME leads with 21.81% vs 2.91% for MOO. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSME has performed better with a 21.81% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSME.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.14% for TSME.
TSME is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.55% for MOO.
TSME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSME and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer