TSLZ vs. SH
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLZ is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -48.25% vs -13.19% for SH. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SH.
Performance
TSLZ vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 45.39% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -6.65% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 44.35%
- 6M
- 37.89%
- YTD
- 45.39%
- 1Y
- -48.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -71.84%
SH
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- -13.19%
- 3Y*
- -10.94%
- 5Y*
- -8.01%
- 10Y*
- -12.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $271.72M | $244.09M | $301.56M | |
| $39.89M | $35.72M | $42.79M |
TSLZ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 45.39% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -24.75% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.65% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and SH is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between TSLZ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
SH
TSLZ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.86 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.73 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | -1.30 | +0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -94.66% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.73% | -16.06% | -53.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.47% | -94.54% | -3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.60% | -67.93% | -8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.63% | 9.03% | +47.60% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 37.13% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 3.51%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.13% | 3.51% | +33.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.39% | 10.08% | +57.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.79% | 12.81% | +78.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.68% | 16.96% | +100.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.68% | 18.02% | +99.66% |
TSLZ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than SH's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.19% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.47% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and SH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (37.13%) compared to SH (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 1-year performance, SH leads with -13.19% vs -48.25% for TSLZ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -13.19% return vs -48.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.47% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 0.89% for SH.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer