TSLZ vs. SH
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLZ is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -64.61% vs -18.28% for SH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
TSLZ vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -8.64% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -16.90%
- 1Y
- -64.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SH
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -8.64%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- -18.28%
- 3Y*
- -13.22%
- 5Y*
- -9.35%
- 10Y*
- -12.95%
TSLZ vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.60% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.64% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -9.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and SH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between TSLZ and SH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
SH
TSLZ vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | -1.56 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | -2.25 | +1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.76 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -1.02 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -1.91 | +0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | -1.56 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.59 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -94.66% | -4.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -18.28% | -58.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -94.66% | -4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -67.72% | -7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | 9.83% | +50.59% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.75%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 2.75% | +21.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | 8.90% | +46.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.67% | 11.78% | +79.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 16.85% | +100.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 18.01% | +99.12% |
TSLZ vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SH's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.54% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and SH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to SH (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 1-year performance, SH leads with -18.28% vs -64.61% for TSLZ. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SH has performed better with a -18.28% return vs -64.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 0.90% for SH.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer