PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLZ vs. PLTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZ's 48.68% return.


TSLZ

1D
11.56%
1M
18.35%
YTD
11.42%
6M
29.37%
1Y
-51.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTZ

1D
4.41%
1M
22.41%
YTD
48.68%
6M
76.10%
1Y
-35.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSLZ and PLTZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLZ vs. PLTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZ
PLTZ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PLTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLZPLTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.01

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.53

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.70

-0.20

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the PLTZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLZ and PLTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and PLTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLZPLTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.11%

-72.51%

-26.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.88%

-67.51%

-5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.83%

-51.04%

-47.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.70%

-55.64%

-20.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

57.22%

51.01%

+6.21%

Volatility

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) is 27.70%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ) has a volatility of 39.87%. This indicates that TSLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLZPLTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.70%

39.87%

-12.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.77%

76.47%

-19.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.07%

102.92%

-14.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.88%

101.96%

+14.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.88%

101.96%

+14.92%

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLZ vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, while PLTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
PLTZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.62%0.69%2.08%12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLZ and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTZ has higher volatility (39.87%) compared to TSLZ (27.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs PLTZ's -72.51%.

On 1-year performance, PLTZ leads with -35.88% vs -51.89% for TSLZ. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 27.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PLTZ has performed better with a -35.88% return vs -51.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for PLTZ.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for PLTZ.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 1.29% for PLTZ.

PLTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLZ and PLTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer